The Ethics in Public Service Act. The?Ethics in Public Service Act (Ethics Act) addresses conflicts of interest, improper use of state resources, compensation for outside activities, and gifts. It prohibits state officers and state employees from using their public employment for personal gain or private advantage, or to provide special privileges or exemptions for anyone else unless required to perform duties within the scope of their employment. The Ethics Act applies to all three branches of government: executive, judicial, and legislative. Each branch has a single board responsible for enforcing the law with respect to employees in that branch. The three boards are the Executive Ethics Board, the Commission on Judicial Conduct, and the Legislative Ethics Board.
Gifts Under the Ethics Act. The Ethics Act generally prohibits a state officer or employee from accepting the following in a calendar year:
A state officer or employee is prohibited from accepting or soliciting any gift that could reasonably be expected to influence the recipient?s vote, action, or judgment.
?
Gift Exemptions. The Legislature has adopted a number of exemptions to the general rule against receiving gifts. In these circumstances, the $50 value threshold does not apply, and the gift is presumed not to influence the recipient. Examples include the following:
?
Legislative Nexus. Legislative nexus must exist before legislators can use public resources. Legislative nexus means that the activity for which the legislator wants to use public resources must have a tangible and substantial connection to the legislature. ?
?
Legislative Ethics Board. The Legislative Ethics Board has nine members, five of which are citizens. The?Legislative Ethics Board enforces the Ethics Act against legislators and legislative staff.
Legislative Ethics?Board's Enforcement Power. The ?Legislative Ethics?Board is authorized to investigate, conduct hearings, order payment of any damages sustained by the state, issue civil penalties, recover reasonable administrative costs, and recommend suspension and dismissal of violators. Penalties must be reduced by the amount of costs assessed, and penalties and costs combined may not exceed $5,000.
Privilege from Suit. ?Members and employees of the Judicial Conduct Commission (commission), including any lawyers or special masters temporarily employed by the commission, are absolutely privileged from suit in any action, civil or criminal, based upon any disciplinary proceedings or upon other official acts as members or employees of the commission. Statements made to the commission or its investigators or other employees are absolutely privileged in actions for defamation. This absolute privilege does not apply to statements made in any other forum.
Revising and Adding Definitions, and Making Technical Changes to the?Ethics in Public Service Act. Various definitions have been revised and added. For example, the definition of gift has been combined with other gift provisions. New terms have been added and defined, such as charitable association, civic organization, and community organization. Various technical changes are made, such as removing obsolete provisions, correcting internal references, and updating statutory citations.
Revising Gift Provisions. The gift threshold amount is raised from $50 to $100.? The Legislative Ethics Board and the Executive Ethics Board may adjust for inflation the gift thresholds every five years.?References to gifts solicited or accepted for the expansion of tourism has been removed because the statute referring to tourism was repealed in 2014. Added to the list of what is not considered a gift are gift cards received by legislative employees in an amount of $25 or less and unsolicited gifts from legislators to legislative staff.
Clarifying Legislative Nexus. In regard to the legislative nexus required for the use of state resources, generally recognized days or months of note may be posted on a legislator's official website as well as posts about achievements, honors or awards of extraordinary distinction relating to a constituent as long as the constituent has agreed to the posting.
Revising Provisions Related to Penalties and Costs. The total $5,000 cap for penalties and costs is removed. Penalties may be ordered not to exceed $5,000. No monetary cap applies to costs that may be ordered.?
?
The committee recommended a different version of the bill than what was heard.? PRO: This is unanimous request from the Legislative Ethics Board (Board), and this is the first bill ever requested by the Board. A lot has changed since 1993, when the Ethics Act was passed. Terms and citations need to be updated and clarified, scattered provisions need to be consolidated, and Board interpretations need to be incorporated.?
?
CON: The immunity provision is being added late as a reaction to on-going litigation against the Board. ?