HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1317
As Reported by House Committee On:
Community Safety
Appropriations
Title: An act relating to persons serving long sentences for offenses committed prior to reaching 21 years of age.
Brief Description: Concerning persons serving long sentences for offenses committed prior to reaching 21 years of age.
Sponsors: Representatives Hackney, Goodman, Simmons, Ormsby, Springer, Pollet and Doglio.
Brief History:
Committee Activity:
Community Safety: 1/20/25, 1/30/25 [DP];
Appropriations: 2/24/25, 2/27/25 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill
  • Permits certain persons convicted of one or more crimes committed under age 21 to petition the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board for early release after serving a specified portion of the sentence in total confinement, depending on the underlying conviction.
  • Requires the sentencing court to impose a maximum term of life imprisonment and a minimum term of total confinement of no less than 25 years for Aggravated Murder in the first degree where the person committed the offense at age 18 to 20 if the court determines that certain mitigating factors of youthfulness apply.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMUNITY SAFETY
Majority Report: Do pass.Signed by 5 members:Representatives Goodman, Chair; Simmons, Vice Chair; Farivar, Fosse and Obras.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by 4 members:Representatives Graham, Ranking Minority Member; Griffey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Burnett and Davis.
Staff: Lena Langer (786-7192).
Background:

Life Sentences for Offenses Committed as a Juvenile.

In 2012 the United States Supreme Court (Supreme Court) held in Miller v. Alabama that the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment forbids a sentencing scheme that mandates life in prison without the possibility of parole for homicides committed as juveniles.  After the Miller decision, the Washington Supreme Court found that Article 1, section 14 of the Washington Constitution prohibited life without parole sentences for juveniles and required courts to exercise complete discretion to consider mitigating circumstances associated with the youthfulness of any juvenile defendant.  In 2021 the Washington Supreme Court also held in In re Monschke that a person who commits Aggravated Murder in the first degree at age 18 to 20 is entitled to a consideration of the Miller mitigating factors at sentencing.

 

Aggravated Murder in the First Degree.

A person is guilty of Aggravated Murder in the first degree if the person commits Murder in the first degree and one or more of 14 statutory aggravating circumstances are present.  Aggravated Murder in the first degree is the most serious criminal offense under state law.  Adults and juveniles convicted of the offense are subject to different sentencing requirements.

 

Age 15 and Younger.

A person who commits Aggravated Murder in the first degree at age 15 or younger must be sentenced to a maximum term of life imprisonment and a minimum term of total confinement of 25 years. 

 

Age 16 to 17.

A person who commits Aggravated Murder in the first degree at age 16 or 17 must be sentenced to a maximum term of life imprisonment and a minimum term of total confinement of no less than 25 years.  In setting a minimum term, the court must take into account certain mitigating factors established by the Supreme Court in Miller.  The Miller mitigating factors include the:  (1) person's age; (2) person's childhood and life experience; (3) degree of responsibility the person was capable of exercising; and (4) person's chances of becoming rehabilitated. 

 

Age 18 to 20.

Per statute, a person who commits Aggravated Murder in the first degree at age 18 or older must be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.  However, under Monschke, a person who commits Aggravated Murder in the first degree at age 18 to 20 is entitled to a consideration of the Miller mitigating factors at sentencing, which may allow the court to impose a sentence other than life imprisonment without parole. 

 

Age 21 and Older.

A person who commits Aggravated Murder in the first degree at age 21 or older must be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. 

 

During the minimum term of total confinement, the individual is not eligible for community custody, earned release time, furlough, home detention, partial confinement, work crew, work release, any other form of early release, or any other form of authorized leave of absence while not in the direct custody of a corrections officer.  The Department of Corrections (DOC) must assess a youthful incarcerated person five years prior to release and provide programming to prepare the individual for release.

 

Indeterminate Sentence Review Board.

After an eligible person has completed the minimum term of the person's sentence for Aggravated Murder in the first degree, the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB) must review the person's case for the possibility of release.  The ISRB must order the person's release unless it is determined by a preponderance of evidence that, despite conditions, it is more likely than not that the person will commit new crimes if released.  If the ISRB does not order release, the ISRB must set a new minimum term not to exceed an additional five years.  If the person is released, the person is subject to community custody under the supervision of the DOC and the authority of the ISRB for a specified period of time. 

 

Review of Sentences for Other Offenses Committed as Juveniles.

A person convicted of one or more crimes committed under age 18 may petition the ISRB for early release after serving no less than 20 years of total confinement, provided the person has not had any new convictions after turning 18, has not had a major violation in the 12 months prior to the petition, and is not serving a sentence for Aggravated Murder in the first degree or a sex offense. 

 

No later than 180 days from receipt of the petition for early release, the DOC must conduct an examination of the person to assist in predicting the dangerousness and likelihood that the individual will engage in future criminal behavior if released.  The ISRB must order that the person be released unless it is determined by a preponderance of the evidence that, despite conditions, the person will commit new criminal law violations if released. 

 

During the review, the ISRB must provide the opportunity for victims and survivors of victims to present statements.  If the ISRB denies release, a new minimum term, not to exceed five years, must be set before another review may take place.

 

If an individual is released after serving the minimum term of confinement, the individual must be subject to community custody under the supervision of the DOC and the authority of the ISRB for a period of time as determined by the ISRB. 

Summary of Bill:

Aggravated Murder in the First Degree.

Statutory sentencing requirements for Aggravated Murder in the first degree are modified to provide that when a person commits the offense at age 18 to 20, the court must impose a maximum term of life imprisonment and a minimum term of total confinement of no less than 25 years if the court determines that the Miller mitigating factors apply.

 

Review of Sentences for Offenses Committed as Juveniles.

A person convicted of one or more crimes committed under age 21, rather than 18, may petition the ISRB for early release after serving no less than 15, rather than 20, years of total confinement, provided the person has not had any new convictions after turning 21, has not had a major violation in the 12 months prior to the petition, and is not serving a sentence for Aggravated Murder in the first degree, Murder in the first degree, or a sex offense. 

 

A person convicted of Murder in the first degree committed under age 21 may petition the ISRB for early release after serving no less than 20 years of total confinement, provided the person has not had any new convictions after turning 21, has not had a major violation in the 12 months prior to the petition, and is not serving a sentence for a sex offense.  

 

A person convicted of Aggravated Murder in the first degree committed under age 21 may petition the ISRB for early release after serving no less than 25 years of total confinement, provided the person has not had any new convictions after turning 21, has not had a major violation in the 12 months prior to the petition, and is not serving a sentence for a sex offense.  

 

A currently incarcerated person may petition the ISRB for early release after the specified number of years of total confinement, dependent on the offense or offenses, regardless of the date of the offense or conviction.

Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 15, 2025.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) This legislation builds on the foundation the Supreme Court established in Miller.  In the years since the Miller decision and subsequent changes in law, there has been a very low recidivism rate for the individuals released by the ISRB.  The bill does not give incarcerated persons a guarantee of release.  Instead, the bill provides that after a certain amount of years, a person has the opportunity to go in front of the ISRB to have their case reviewed.  The ISRB makes decisions based on the evidence presented.  Under the age of 25, the brain is not fully developed.  These individuals committed serious offenses as juveniles, and now they are middle-aged or elderly.  Those that have earned a right to release could be released and contribute positively to society.  Lengthy sentences affect more than just the incarcerated; they affect the families of those incarcerated.  People are not the same when they are under 21 as when they are 40.  Decades of brain research has shown that a brain continues to develop after age 18.  Brain maturation has a profound impact on decision-making.  People are less likely to make impulsive decisions as the brain develops and people get older.  Adolescents and young adults are especially vulnerable when facing stressful environments, rushed timelines, peer influence, and emotionally charged environments.  Research consistently shows that the risk of recidivism drops as people age.  

 

This bill holds the promise of hope, transformation, and healing, not only for those who are incarcerated, but also for their families.  This bill will encourage incarcerated people to take responsibility, seek programing, and embrace their healing journey.  There are many incarcerated people who have been in prison for decades who have changed and deserve to be released.  The widespread imposition of long and life sentences is an inefficient and expensive way to protect public safety.  Just because someone has the opportunity to go in front of the ISRB does not mean that person will be released from confinement.  The ISRB does a rigorous review to see if a person is eligible for release.

 

(Opposed) This bill extends presumptive release hearings for those who committed offenses under 18 to those who committed offenses under 21.  There is concern that the language of the bill that applies these processes to persons who committed offenses over the age 18 does not include the qualifying language of the mitigating factors.  The provisions of the bill that are in response to Monschke are close to what the prosecutors want.

Persons Testifying:

(In support) Representative David Hackney, prime sponsor; Matthew Leon; Jeffrey Ellis; Arthur Longworth, TeamChild; Matthew Leon; Dr. Catherine Insel, Northwestern University; Jeff Ellis; Daniel Landsman, FAMM; Sean Reilly; Tom Sahlberg; Eugene Youngblood, Look2Justice; Gail Brashear; Arthur Longworth, TeamChild; and Christina Sorenson, Team Child.

(Opposed) Russell Brown, WA Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying:

Crystal Waterbury.

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass.Signed by 19 members:Representatives Ormsby, Chair; Gregerson, Vice Chair; Macri, Vice Chair; Berg, Bergquist, Callan, Cortes, Doglio, Fitzgibbon, Leavitt, Lekanoff, Peterson, Pollet, Ryu, Springer, Stonier, Street, Thai and Tharinger.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by 12 members:Representatives Couture, Ranking Minority Member; Connors, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Penner, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Schmick, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Burnett, Caldier, Corry, Dye, Keaton, Manjarrez, Marshall and Rude.
Staff: Yvonne Walker (786-7841).
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Appropriations Compared to Recommendation of Committee On Community Safety:

A provision is added making the bill null and void if not funded in the budget.

Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Preliminary fiscal note available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of the session in which the bill is passed.  However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:

(In support) The cost of incarceration and healthcare for incarcerated individuals can be quite expensive.  Today the average cost to incarcerate a person is $76,000 per year.  The benefit to having an individual who has earned their release, is working and raising a family, and contributing to the community is greater than the average annual cost to incarcerate that person.  If the state were to release just 10 individuals and each person had an average of 10 years left to serve, then the state would save $7.6 million without compromising public safety.

 

The cost of this bill seems overblown and the number of personal restraint petitions that will eventually be filed and subsequently defended is projected to be small.  Over the long run, this bill will fund itself by rehabilitating inmates in expensive confinement.  In addition, community safety will be protected as all individuals will still be required to serve their court ordered minimum terms.

 

Studies have shown that brain development does not end at the age of 18 but continues until most individuals are 21 years old.  The widespread imposition of long and life sentences and the severity of punishment in Washington is an inefficient and ineffective way to protect public safety and deter criminal behavior.

 

(Opposed) Neither the increased costs nor the potential savings of this bill justifies this particular policy.  This bill adopts a juvenile presumptive release hearing for adult-aged individuals who are not required to exhibit any mitigating qualities of youth.  This bill is not appropriate for adults.

Persons Testifying:

(In support) Jeffrey Ellis; Daniel Landsman, FAMM; Tom Sahlberg; Jenson Hankins; and Sarah Leon, Community Justice Alliance.

(Opposed) Russell Brown, WA Association of Prosecuting Attorneys.
Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.