Correctional and Detention Facilities.
Correctional and detention facilities are used to detain persons for a variety of purposes, including pretrial detention and sentencing. "Detention facility" means any facility in which persons are incarcerated or otherwise involuntarily confined for purposes including prior to trial or sentencing, fulfilling the terms of a sentence imposed by a court, or for other judicial or administrative processes or proceedings.
Pretrial detention and sentences up to one year are carried out by locally and publicly operated jail facilities, while sentences over one year are served in state prison facilities operated and managed by the Department of Corrections. Juvenile sentences of 30 days or less are served in locally operated juvenile detention facilities, while longer sentences are served in juvenile rehabilitation facilities operated and managed by the Department of Children, Youth, and Families.
Regulation of Private Detention Facilities.
"Private detention facility" means a detention facility that is operated by a private, nongovernmental, for-profit entity and operating pursuant to a contract or agreement with a federal, state, or local governmental entity.
In 2023 the state enacted House Bill (HB) 1470, which included provisions related to:
Operational Standards.
The Department of Health (DOH) is required to adopt rules governing private detention facilities' operations related to sanitary, hygienic, and safe conditions. The rules must address specific topics including, for example, sanitation standards, dietary requirements, and environmental conditions.
Private detention facilities with contracts with effective dates on or after January 1, 2023, or facilities that extend or modify contracts with effective dates prior to January 1, 2023, must comply with additional requirements addressing:
The Office of the Attorney General (AGO) is authorized to enforce violations of these rules and requirements.
Inspections by State and Local Agencies.
The DOH is required to adopt rules related to the inspection of food services and handling, sanitation and hygiene, nutrition, complaints, food provided, and testing of water and air. The DOH must post inspection results on its website and at private detention facilities in conspicuous places. The DOH may delegate food safety inspections to local health jurisdictions. The Department of Labor and Industries is required to conduct inspections for workplace conditions and work undertaken by detained persons. The AGO is authorized to enforce violations found in the agencies' inspections.
Private Rights of Action and Civil Penalties.
A detained person has a right of action against the owner, operator, contractor, subcontractor, or employee of a private detention facility for certain violations of state law. A negligent violation permits recovery of $1,000 or actual damages, while an intentional or reckless violation permits recovery of $10,000 or actual damages. If the detained person prevails, the person is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. The court may grant injunctive relief without a bond. The private right of action has a three-year statute of limitations.
The DOH may create penalties for failure to comply with certain regulations of private detention facilities. Penalties may only be imposed against the owner, operator, contractor, subcontractor, or employee of a private detention facility. If the DOH collects the penalty, it must be deposited into the State General Fund. The AGO is authorized to pursue recovery of unpaid penalties in superior court. Any recovery by the AGO must be deposited into the Washington State Attorney General Humane Detention Account.
Exemptions.
Certain facilities are exempted from the aforementioned regulations, including facilities:
Preliminary Injunction of Enforcement.
In 2024 the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granted, in part, a preliminary injunction to enjoin the state and its agencies from enforcing certain provisions of HB 1470 against the GEO Group, operator of the Northwest ICE Processing Center. The preliminary injunction specifically enjoins enforcement of the statutory provisions related to operational standards adopted in rules by the DOH, inspections, and private rights of action and civil penalties. However, the preliminary injunction does not enjoin enforcement of the operational standards applicable to private detention facilities with contracts with effective dates on or after January 1, 2023, or facilities that extend or modify contracts with effective dates prior to January 1, 2023.
Regulation of Private Detention Facilities.
The definition of "private detention facility" is expanded to include any detention facility that is operated by a private, nongovernmental entity and operating pursuant to a contract or agreement with a federal, state, or local governmental entity, regardless of whether the facility is for-profit.
Statutory provisions related to the regulation of private detention facilities are modified, including provisions related to:
Operational Standards.
The requirement for the Department of Health (DOH) to adopt rules governing private detention facilities' operations related to sanitary, hygienic, and safe conditions is modified. The rules must require private detention facilities to provide:
The additional requirements imposed on private detention facilities with contracts with effective dates on or after January 1, 2023, or facilities that extend or modify contracts with effective dates prior to January 1, 2023, are modified. Such facilities must:
Inspections of Private Detention Facilities by State and Local Agencies.
The DOH is authorized to inspect a private detention facility at any time to determine whether it has failed or refused to comply with applicable state or federal law regulating such facilities. As resources allow, the DOH must make private detention facility inspection statements of deficiencies, plans of correction, notice of acceptance of plans of correction, enforcement actions, and notices of resolution available to the public on the internet.
Civil Penalties.
If the DOH conducts an inspection of a private detention facility and finds that the private detention facility has failed or refused to comply with applicable state statutes or regulations, the DOH may take corrective actions under specified circumstances. When the private detention facility has previously been subject to an enforcement action for the same or similar type of violation of the same statute or rule, or has been given any previous statement of deficiency that included the same or similar type of violation of the same or similar statute or rule, or has failed to correct noncompliance with a statute or rule by an agreed or established date, the DOH the may:
Proceeds from such fines may only be used by the DOH to provide training or technical assistance to private detention facilities. The DOH must adopt in rules specific fine amounts in relation to the severity of the noncompliance. The private detention facility has the right to appeal such fines.
Exemptions.
The statutory provision exempting certain juvenile facilities from regulation is modified to instead exempt facilities that provide counseling, treatment, mental health, educational, or medical services to juveniles pursuant to specified licensing by the Department of Children, Youth, and Families.
The substitute bill: (1) eliminates language from current law that limits the definition of "private detention facility" to for-profit facilities; (2) modifies the provision exempting certain juvenile facilities from regulation to instead exempt facilities that provide counseling, treatment, mental health, educational, or medical services to juveniles pursuant to specified licensing by the Department of Children, Youth, and Families; and (3) corrects two references to "private detention centers" in the original bill to instead reference "private detention facilities."
(In support) The state has a right to protect the general safety, health, and welfare of people within its borders. Currently, detainees in private detention facilities are being held for extended periods without being convicted of a crime or having the chance for a fair hearing, and they are experiencing unjust violations of their fundamental rights. People are missing scheduled surgeries and failing to receive needed medical care, there is a lack of cleanliness and hygiene in living units, and sexual assaults have been reported. The state has been working for several years on regulating detention centers operated by private companies. Whether a detention facility is public or private, it should be required to maintain basic humane standards for things like food, ventilation, medical care, and safeguarding against abuse. This bill clarifies operational standards for any private detention facility in the state and brings those standards into alignment with existing Department of Health (DOH) rules. There is an exemption for certain facilities that operate pursuant to a license issued by the Department of Children, Youth, and Families because those facilities are already inspected on a regular basis.
Every day in the life of a mixed-status family involves the possibility of coming home to find that someone has been detained. Family members are being held involuntarily and are vulnerable. Ethical responsibility does not end at the prison gate. The Stanford Prison Experiment serves as a reminder of the dangers that happen behind locked doors. Secrecy is only for people who have something to hide. Any detention facility in the state should be subject to inspection by state agencies and held accountable. This bill strengthens existing laws so that the DOH can get through the door to inspect facilities and enforce basic standards.
(Opposed) None.
(Other) There is a non-profit private detention facility for juveniles in the state that hopes to continue its ongoing partnership with several counties if this bill is enacted.
(In support) Representative Lillian Ortiz-Self, prime sponsor; Leslie Cushman, Latino Civic Alliance; Liliana Chumpitasi, La Resistencia; Tim Warden-Hertz, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project; Antonio Ginatta, Columbia Legal Services; Breck Lebegue MD MPH; Isela Bonilla, Student; Michelle Carrillo, Student; and Ashley Ramirez, UW Tacoma Student.