BILL REQ. #: H-4899.1
State of Washington | 58th Legislature | 2004 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/06/04.
WHEREAS, The Higher Education Coordinating Board is required to
prepare a strategic master plan for higher education every four years
that proposes a vision and identifies goals and priorities for the
higher education system in Washington state and identifies strategies
for achieving the board's goals; and
WHEREAS, The board, in accordance with House Bill No. 2076,
developed an interim strategic master plan and presented the plan to
the Legislature and Governor on December 15, 2003, as required by the
statute; and
WHEREAS, The Legislature recognizes the need for Washington to
provide affordable access for nearly thirty-five thousand additional
students in higher education; and
WHEREAS, As a result, the strategic master plan for higher
education must be comprehensive and include specific enrollment
forecasts and locations, service delivery models, timelines, and
benchmarks for achieving its recommendations; and
WHEREAS, The Legislature acknowledges that accountability for
achieving the goals in the master plan rests with all parties: The
institutions of higher education, various state boards and agencies,
and the Legislature;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the House of Representatives of
the state of Washington, the Senate concurring, That the Legislature
request the board to make the final 2004 strategic master plan both a
platform for enhanced advocacy on behalf of higher education and a tool
for coordinated planning, funding, and building to meet increased
demand for higher education; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the board include the following
information in the final plan:
(1) Additional analysis regarding the board's goal to increase by
twenty percent the total number of students who earn college degrees
and earn job training credentials by the year 2010, including:
(a) The number of students expected to demand access in each sector
of postsecondary education, by region;
(b) The current service delivery model and its capacity under
current plans to enroll additional students, any proposed changes to
the service delivery model, and the potential consequences of those
changes;
(c) The economic demand for education and training in general and
specific fields and at all levels of postsecondary education; and
(d) The estimated costs of meeting the board's enrollment goal,
with alternative scenarios depending on the service delivery model; and
(2) Specific recommendations for how the state can best meet the
board's goal, including the number of students to be added at each
current campus or center; proposals for additional locations or methods
for delivering education; and resulting capital and operating costs;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Legislature concur with the
board's general strategies to improve educational efficiency, promote
innovation in service delivery, improve higher education's
responsiveness to the state's economic needs, and improve K-12/higher
education linkages to promote student success in college. However, to
be more effective, the board should target a limited number of
strategies and provide more specificity in how these strategies will be
accomplished, including supporting data and analysis regarding the
problems and proposed solutions; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the final plan recognize that while
institutions are temporarily authorized to establish tuition and fees
for nonresident and graduate students, the Legislature maintains
responsibility to establish tuition and fees for resident undergraduate
students; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That within the current higher education
governance structure, the board, the State Board for Community and
Technical Colleges, and the Work Force Training and Education
Coordinating Board work to improve communication and minimize
duplication among the three agencies; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the final plan contain measurable
performance indicators, targets, and benchmarks to gauge progress
toward achieving the plan's goals for quantity, cost, quality, and
timeliness, including recommendations for specific actions on the part
of higher education institutions, education boards and agencies, and
the Legislature, so that each can be held accountable.